lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1529354549.3092.36.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:42:29 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bitfield: fix *_encode_bits()

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 23:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> The idea is to print what was the input, expected output and actual result.
> Then you would see what exactly is broken.

Yeah, I guess we could. I did some of that work.

> I dunno how much we may take away from this certain test case, though
> it would be better for my opinion.

TBH though, I'm not sure I want to do this (right now at least). I don't
think we gain anything from it, it's so basic ... so to me it's just
pointless extra code.

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ