[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1529354549.3092.36.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:42:29 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bitfield: fix *_encode_bits()
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 23:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The idea is to print what was the input, expected output and actual result.
> Then you would see what exactly is broken.
Yeah, I guess we could. I did some of that work.
> I dunno how much we may take away from this certain test case, though
> it would be better for my opinion.
TBH though, I'm not sure I want to do this (right now at least). I don't
think we gain anything from it, it's so basic ... so to me it's just
pointless extra code.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists