linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm, proc: add KReclaimable to /proc/meminfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:33:17 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm, proc: add KReclaimable to /proc/meminfo

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:07 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:

> The vmstat NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE counter is for kernel non-slab
> allocations that can be reclaimed via shrinker. In /proc/meminfo, we can show
> the sum of all reclaimable kernel allocations (including slab) as
> "KReclaimable". Add the same counter also to per-node meminfo under /sys

Why do you consider this useful enough to justify adding it to
/pro/meminfo?  How will people use it, what benefit will they see, etc?


Maybe you've undersold this whole patchset, but I'm struggling a bit to
see what the end-user benefits are.  What would be wrong with just
sticking with what we have now?