[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180618143317.eb8f5d7b6c667784343ef902@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:33:17 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm, proc: add KReclaimable to /proc/meminfo
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:18:07 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> The vmstat NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE counter is for kernel non-slab
> allocations that can be reclaimed via shrinker. In /proc/meminfo, we can show
> the sum of all reclaimable kernel allocations (including slab) as
> "KReclaimable". Add the same counter also to per-node meminfo under /sys
Why do you consider this useful enough to justify adding it to
/pro/meminfo? How will people use it, what benefit will they see, etc?
Maybe you've undersold this whole patchset, but I'm struggling a bit to
see what the end-user benefits are. What would be wrong with just
sticking with what we have now?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists