[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa50bbcf-73ad-271f-c926-09d9e0369665@deltatee.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:25:31 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: Introduce the disable_acs_redir parameter
On 18/06/18 04:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Seems that too much is taken from the dynamic resource alignment that
> doesn't necessarily apply to a read-only, commandline-only, device
> discovery-only option. I don't think we need locking, I don't think we
> need a massive static buffer, ideally perhaps even no buffer, just a
> pointer to commandline. Thanks,
Yeah, fair points. I'll take another look and see what I can strip out.
Thanks,
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists