linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 221/279] x86: Delay skip of emulated hypercall instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180618080617.988782810@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:26 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marian Rotariu <mrotariu@...defender.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 221/279] x86: Delay skip of emulated hypercall instruction

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marian Rotariu <mrotariu@...defender.com>

[ Upstream commit 6356ee0c9602004e0a3b4b2dad68ee2ee9385b17 ]

The IP increment should be done after the hypercall emulation, after
calling the various handlers. In this way, these handlers can accurately
identify the the IP of the VMCALL if they need it.

This patch keeps the same functionality for the Hyper-V handler which does
not use the return code of the standard kvm_skip_emulated_instruction()
call.

Signed-off-by: Marian Rotariu <mrotariu@...defender.com>
[Hyper-V hypercalls also need kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c    |   19 +++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int kvm_hv_hypercall_complete_use
 	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 
 	kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, run->hyperv.u.hcall.result);
-	return 1;
+	return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
 int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6553,12 +6553,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(struct kv
 int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
-	int op_64_bit, r;
+	int op_64_bit;
 
-	r = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
-
-	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
-		return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
+	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) {
+		if (!kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu))
+			return 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
 	a0 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
@@ -6579,7 +6580,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcp
 
 	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0) {
 		ret = -KVM_EPERM;
-		goto out;
+		goto out_error;
 	}
 
 	switch (nr) {
@@ -6599,12 +6600,14 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcp
 		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
 		break;
 	}
-out:
+out_error:
 	if (!op_64_bit)
 		ret = (u32)ret;
 	kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, ret);
+
+out:
 	++vcpu->stat.hypercalls;
-	return r;
+	return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_hypercall);