[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180618080618.793993947@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 242/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 3fcd2b2d928904cbf30b01e2c5e4f1dd2f9ab262 ]
We currently have an execute-only test, but it is for
the explicit mprotect_pkey() interface. We will soon
add a test for the implicit mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
enterface. We need this code in both tests.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171347.C64AB733@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1253,12 +1253,9 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
free(plain_ptr_unaligned);
}
-void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+void *get_pointer_to_instructions(void)
{
void *p1;
- int scratch;
- int ptr_contents;
- int ret;
p1 = ALIGN_PTR_UP(&lots_o_noops_around_write, PAGE_SIZE);
dprintf3("&lots_o_noops: %p\n", &lots_o_noops_around_write);
@@ -1268,7 +1265,23 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
/* Point 'p1' at the *second* page of the function: */
p1 += PAGE_SIZE;
+ /*
+ * Try to ensure we fault this in on next touch to ensure
+ * we get an instruction fault as opposed to a data one
+ */
madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+
+ return p1;
+}
+
+void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+ void *p1;
+ int scratch;
+ int ptr_contents;
+ int ret;
+
+ p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists