[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180618080618.682438301@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 239/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit a50093d60464dd51d1ae0c2267b0abe9e1de77f3 ]
There is some noisy debug code at the end of the signal handler. It was
disabled by an early, unconditional "return". However, that return also
hid a dprint_in_signal=0, which kept dprint_in_signal=1 and effectively
locked us into permanent dprint_in_signal=1 behavior.
Remove the return and the dead code, fixing dprint_in_signal.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171342.846B9B2E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -325,22 +325,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
dprintf1("WARNING: set PRKU=0 to allow faulting instruction to continue\n");
pkru_faults++;
dprintf1("<<<<==================================================\n");
- return;
- if (trapno == 14) {
- fprintf(stderr,
- "ERROR: In signal handler, page fault, trapno = %d, ip = %016lx\n",
- trapno, ip);
- fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
- fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
- (unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
- exit(1);
- } else {
- fprintf(stderr, "unexpected trap %d! at 0x%lx\n", trapno, ip);
- fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
- fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
- (unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
- exit(2);
- }
dprint_in_signal = 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists