[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180618081213.761356218@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 112/189] smc: fix sendpage() call
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stefan Raspl <stefan.raspl@...ux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit bda27ff5c4526f80a7620a94ecfe8dca153e3696 ]
The sendpage() call grabs the sock lock before calling the default
implementation - which tries to grab it once again.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com><
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1264,8 +1264,11 @@ static ssize_t smc_sendpage(struct socke
smc = smc_sk(sk);
lock_sock(sk);
- if (sk->sk_state != SMC_ACTIVE)
+ if (sk->sk_state != SMC_ACTIVE) {
+ release_sock(sk);
goto out;
+ }
+ release_sock(sk);
if (smc->use_fallback)
rc = kernel_sendpage(smc->clcsock, page, offset,
size, flags);
@@ -1273,7 +1276,6 @@ static ssize_t smc_sendpage(struct socke
rc = sock_no_sendpage(sock, page, offset, size, flags);
out:
- release_sock(sk);
return rc;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists