[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180618081215.733540335@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:14:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 162/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 3d64f4ed15c3c53dba4c514bf59c334464dee373 ]
We dump out the entire area of the siginfo where the si_pkey_ptr is
supposed to be. But, we do some math on the poitner, which is a u32.
We intended to do byte math, not u32 math on the pointer.
Cast it over to a u8* so it works.
Also, move this block of code to below th si_code check. It doesn't
hurt anything, but the si_pkey field is gibberish for other signal
types.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171352.9BE09819@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
dump_mem(pkru_ptr - 128, 256);
pkey_assert(*pkru_ptr);
- si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
- dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
- dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
- siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
- pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
- last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
-
if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
(si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
(si->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) {
@@ -317,6 +310,13 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
exit(4);
}
+ si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+ dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
+ dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
+ siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
+ pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
+ last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
+
dprintf1("signal pkru from xsave: %08x\n", *pkru_ptr);
/* need __rdpkru() version so we do not do shadow_pkru checking */
dprintf1("signal pkru from pkru: %08x\n", __rdpkru());
Powered by blists - more mailing lists