[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618100721.qvm4maovfhxbfoo7@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:07:21 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 09/17] x86/mm: Implement page_keyid() using page_ext
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 06:20:10PM +0000, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > +int page_keyid(const struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + if (mktme_status != MKTME_ENABLED)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return lookup_page_ext(page)->keyid;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_keyid);
>
> Please start using a proper X86_FEATURE_* flag for this. It will give
> you all the fancy static patching that you are missing by doing it this way.
There's no MKTME CPU feature.
Well, I guess we can invent syntactic one or just use static key directly.
Let's see how it behaves performance-wise before optimizing this.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists