lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618104149.GH2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:41:49 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "yao.jin@...ux.intel.com" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "me@...ehuey.com" <me@...ehuey.com>,
        LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/core: Use sysctl to turn on/off dropping
 leaked kernel samples

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:31:34PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:02:53PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:10 PM Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > +       /*
> > > > +        * Due to interrupt latency (AKA "skid"), we may enter the
> > > > +        * kernel before taking an overflow, even if the PMU is only
> > > > +        * counting user events.
> > > > +        * To avoid leaking information to userspace, we must always
> > > > +        * reject kernel samples when exclude_kernel is set.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (event->attr.exclude_kernel && !user_mode(regs))
> > > > +               return false;
> > > > +
> > > And how does that filter PEBS or LBR records?
> > 
> > I suspect the user_mode() thing actually covers PEBS, but yes LBR might need
> > additional filtering.
> 
> I think the large PEBS still need to be specially handled.

large pebs should be fine too, all pebs stuff eventually calls
perf_event_output() with a synthesized register set.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ