[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618105102.GJ2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:51:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/core: Use sysctl to turn on/off dropping
leaked kernel samples
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:27:27AM +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:36 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> >
> > At least for sampling the GPRs, we could do something like below
> > unconditionally, which seems sufficient for my test cases.
>
> Ack.
>
> The PEBS case may need checking, but maybe PEBS doesn't even have this issue?
Sadly PEBS is susceptible as well, but the proposed patch actually works
for that as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists