lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:26:43 +0200
From:   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: hypfs: use ktime_get_seconds() instead of
 get_seconds()

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:05:00 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> time_t and get_seconds() are deprecated because they will overflow on
> 32-bit architectures in the future. This is not a problem on 64-bit s390,
> but we should use proper interfaces anyway.
> 
> Besides moving to the time64_t based interface, the CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> based ktime_get_seconds() is preferred for kernel internal timekeeping
> because it does not behave in unexpected ways during leap second changes
> or settimeofday() calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Added to my set of patches for the next merge window.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ