[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618160630.261404f8@xps13>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:06:30 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mxc: set spare area size register
explicitly
Hi Martin,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 15:31:27 +0200, Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
wrote:
> The v21 version of the NAND flash controller contains a Spare Area Size
> Register (SPAS) at offset 0x10. Its setting defaults to the maximum
> spare area size of 218 bytes. The size that is set in this register is
> used by the controller when it calculates the ECC bytes internally in
> hardware.
>
> Usually, this register is updated from settings in the IIM fuses when
> the system is booting from NAND flash. For other boot media, however,
> the SPAS register remains at the default setting, which may not work for
> the particular flash chip on the board. The same goes for flash chips
> whose configuration cannot be set in the IIM fuses (e.g. chips with 2k
> sector size and 128 bytes spare area size can't be configured in the IIM
> fuses on imx25 systems).
>
> Set the SPAS register explicitly during the preset operation. Derive the
> register value from mtd->oobsize that was detected during probe by
> decoding the flash chip's ID bytes.
>
> While at it, rename the define for the spare area register's offset to
> NFC_V21_RSLTSPARE_AREA. The register at offset 0x10 on v1 controllers is
> different from the register on v21 controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
> Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
Thanks, I'm ok with the patch, I'll queue it to nand/next.
> changes in v2
> - fix the commit message
> - use '/ 2' instead of shift operator for division
>
> BTW is it ok to keep a Reviewed-by tag when updating the patch?
I think so, at least for such minor updates it is okay :)
Regards,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists