linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180618142036.GA13097@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:20:36 +0200
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default
 hierarchy

Hi,

On 18/06/18 12:13, Waiman Long wrote:
> v10:
>  - Remove the cpuset.sched.load_balance patch for now as it may not
>    be that useful.
>  - Break the large patch 2 into smaller patches to make them a bit
>    easier to review.
>  - Test and fix issues related to changing "cpuset.cpus" and cpu
>    online/offline in a domain root.
>  - Rename isolated_cpus to reserved_cpus as this cpumask holds CPUs
>    reserved for child sched domains.
>  - Rework the scheduling domain debug printing code in the last patch.
>  - Document update to the newly moved
>    Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst.

There seem to be two (similar but different) 6/9 in the set. Something
went wrong?

Also I can't seem to be able to create a subgroup with an isolated
domain root. I think that, when doing the following

 # mount -t cgroup2 none /sys/fs/cgroup
 # echo "+cpuset" >/sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control 
 # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/g1
 # echo 0-1 >/sys/fs/cgroup/g1/cpuset.cpus
 # echo 1 >/sys/fs/cgroup/g1/cpuset.sched.domain_root

rebuild_sched_domains_locked exits early, since
top_cpuset.effective_cpus != cpu_active_mask. (effective_cpus being 2-3
at this point since I'm testing this on a 0-3 system)

In your v9 this [1] was adding a special condition to make rebuilding of
domains happen. Was the change intentional?

Thanks,

- Juri

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152760142531222&w=2