lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
        prarit@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] x86/tsc: remove tsc_disabled flag

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > It does not; there is TSC usage even if you boot with notsc on. See how
> > > it does not clear X86_FEATURE_TSC for instance.
> > 
> > Well, kinda. There is some stuff in the apic calibration which uses TSC
> > independent of tsc_disabled, but that's about it.
> 
> Still, that precludes booting on hardware without TSC, so what's the
> point of having notsc? I'm all for killing the thing.

I'm not arguing against removing it. I just refuse to accept changelogs
which suggest that there is no functional change.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ