linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mtd: rawnand: micron: add fixup for ONFI revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619080224.3bc1efa3@bbrezillon>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:02:24 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        computersforpeace@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mtd: rawnand: micron: add fixup for ONFI
 revision

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:31:22 +1200
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:

> Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the
> revision number field of the ONFI parameter page. Rather than rejecting
> these outright assume ONFI version 1.0 if the revision number is 00 00.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
> This is now qualified on vendor == MICRON. I haven't qualified this
> based on specific chips the ABAFA (id=d1) and ABBFA (id=a1) variants are
> documented to have this behaviour.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - use fixup_onfi_param_page
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> index 0af45b134c0c..e582c9e61715 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,14 @@ static int micron_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void micron_fixup_onfi_param_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
> +					 struct nand_onfi_params *p)
> +{

Could you add a comment repeating what you have in your commit message
here?

With this addressed

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>

> +	if (le16_to_cpu(p->revision) == 0)
> +		p->revision = cpu_to_le16(1 << 1);
> +}
> +
>  const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops = {
>  	.init = micron_nand_init,
> +	.fixup_onfi_param_page = micron_fixup_onfi_param_page,
>  };