[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619082716.GD405@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:27:16 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "4 . 13+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: Prevent deadlock when serializing NMI
backtraces
On (06/19/18 09:52), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2018-06-18 19:07:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (06/18/18 11:39), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > Hmm. Can't answer right now :)
>
> Please, let me know what name you would like ;-)
:) Wow, it's hard. Maybe we can derive some bits from the ftrace_dump()
function name? Dunno... Does printk_dump_nmi_enter() sound terrible?
Maybe Steven has some opinions on this?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists