[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqH_520Z4nAkXsnKeO9ZGqSSfPg_7f7pjJs=t=ryQTBExfwoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:41:01 +0200
From: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] mfd: cros_ec: Add throttler sub-device
Hi Matthias,
I am also interested on the answer of Brian comments :). One small comment.
Missatge de Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> del dia dt., 19 de
juny 2018 a les 1:22:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Instantiate the CrOS EC throttler if it is enabled in the kernel
> > configuration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - patch added to series
> >
> > drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> > index 36156a41499c..5f52b6e2c21a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> > @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static int cros_ec_sleep_event(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 sleep_event)
> > return cros_ec_cmd_xfer(ec_dev, &buf.msg);
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct mfd_cell ec_throttler_cell = {
> > + { .name = "cros-ec-throttler" }
> > +};
> > +
As Brian said I think that this should go in cros_ec_dev?
Even when only there is one cell we tend to use the array format (see
i.e the cros-ec-rtc and the others in cros_ec_dev).
+static const struct mfd_cell ec_throttler_cells[] = {
+ { .name = "cros-ec-throttler" }
+};
> > int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = ec_dev->dev;
> > @@ -153,6 +157,18 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CROS_EC_THROTTLER)) {
> > + err = mfd_add_devices(ec_dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > + &ec_throttler_cell, 1, NULL, ec_dev->irq,
ARRAY_SIZE(ec_throttler_cells)
> > + NULL);
>
> Most of this similar sub-device registration seems to have moved to
> cros_ec_dev.c, in ec_device_probe(). Should this do the same?
>
> And on a similar note: is there a way to determine EC support for this
> feature (e.g., EC_FEATURE_*)? Or do we just have to listen for
> appropriate throttling events that may never come?
>
> Also, is this very useful on non-DT systems? Does this fail gracefully?
>
> Brian
>
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev,
> > + "Failed to register throttler subdevice %d\n",
> > + err);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> > err = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > if (err) {
> > --
> > 2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a-goog
> >
Cheers,
Enric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists