lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a274f8ff-989a-ccb8-3cc1-78fbdec0604a@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:44:57 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+10007d66ca02b08f0e60@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __get_super

This bug report is getting no feedback, but I guess that this bug is in
block or mm or locking layer rather than fs layer.

NMI backtrace for this bug tends to report that sb_bread() from fill_super()
 from mount_bdev() is stalling is the cause of keep holding s_umount_key for
more than 120 seconds. What is strange is that NMI backtrace for this bug tends
to point at rcu_read_lock()/pagecache_get_page()/radix_tree_deref_slot()/
rcu_read_unlock() which is expected not to stall.

Since CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT is set to 120 (and actually +5 due to
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) which is longer than CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT,
maybe setting CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT to smaller values (e.g. 25) can
give us some hints...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ