lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a274f8ff-989a-ccb8-3cc1-78fbdec0604a@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:44:57 +0900 From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> To: syzbot <syzbot+10007d66ca02b08f0e60@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __get_super This bug report is getting no feedback, but I guess that this bug is in block or mm or locking layer rather than fs layer. NMI backtrace for this bug tends to report that sb_bread() from fill_super() from mount_bdev() is stalling is the cause of keep holding s_umount_key for more than 120 seconds. What is strange is that NMI backtrace for this bug tends to point at rcu_read_lock()/pagecache_get_page()/radix_tree_deref_slot()/ rcu_read_unlock() which is expected not to stall. Since CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT is set to 120 (and actually +5 due to CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) which is longer than CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT, maybe setting CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT to smaller values (e.g. 25) can give us some hints...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists