linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 12/13] intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619133043.GG5609@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:30:43 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 12/13] intel_sgx: driver documentation

On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:32:17AM -0700, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> On 2018-06-08 10:09, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > +Launching enclaves
> > +------------------
> > +
> > +For privileged enclaves the launch is performed simply by submitting the
> > +SIGSTRUCT for that enclave to ENCLS(EINIT). For unprivileged enclaves the
> > +driver hosts a process in ring-3 that hosts a launch enclave signed with a key
> > +supplied for kbuild.
> > +
> > +The current implementation of the launch enclave generates a token for any
> > +enclave. In the future it could be potentially extended to have ways to
> > +configure policy what can be lauched.
> > +
> > +The driver will fail to initialize if it cannot start its own launch enclave.
> > +A user space application can submit a SIGSTRUCT instance through the ioctl API.
> > +The kernel will take care of the rest.
> > +
> > +This design assures that the Linux kernel has always full control, which
> > +enclaves get to launch and which do not, even if the public key MSRs are
> 
> As discussed previously at length, since the kernel needs to execute
> ENCLS[EINIT], it has full control to deny the launching of enclaves
> regardless of any launch enclave implementation. Please change this
> misleading statement.

Remember the discussion, forgot to change it. I'll fix this for the next
version.

/Jarkko