linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619140818.GA16927@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:08:26 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, wanghuiqiang@...wei.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        zhongjiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
        linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue 19-06-18 20:03:07, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I tested on a arm board with 128 cores 4 numa nodes, but I set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=72.
> >> Then node 3 is not be created, because node 3 has no memory, and no cpu.
> >> But some pci device may related to node 3, which be set in ACPI table.
> >
> > Could you double check that zonelists for node 3 are generated
> > correctly?
> 
> The cpus in node 3 aren't onlined and there's no memory attached - I
> suspect that no zonelists are built for this node.
> 
> We skip creating a node, if the number of SRAT entries parsed exceeds
> NR_CPUS[0]. This in turn prevents onlining the numa node and so no
> zonelists will be created for it.
> 
> I think the problem will go away if the cpus are restricted via the
> kernel command line by setting nr_cpus.
> 
> Xie, can you try the below patch on top of the one enabling memoryless
> nodes? I'm not sure this is the right solution but at least it'll
> confirm the problem.

This issue looks familiar (or at least related):

git log d3bd058826aa

The reason why the NR_CPUS guard is there is to avoid overflowing
the early_node_cpu_hwid array. IA64 does something different in
that respect compared to x86, we have to have a look into this.

Regardless, AFAICS the proximity domains to nodes mappings should not
depend on CONFIG_NR_CPUS, it seems that there is something wrong in that
in ARM64 ACPI SRAT parsing.

Lorenzo

> 
> Thanks,
> Punit
> 
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c?h=v4.18-rc1#n73
> 
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index d190a7b231bf..fea0f7164f1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -70,11 +70,9 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
>         if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED))
>                 return;
> 
> -   if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS) {
> + if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS)
>                 pr_warn_once("SRAT: cpu_to_node_map[%d] is too small, may not be able to use all cpus\n",
>                              NR_CPUS);
> -           return;
> -   }
> 
>         pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
>         node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);