[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619040630.GK25852@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:36:30 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwrng: msm - Add support for prng v2
On 18-06-18, 13:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-06-18 11:21:23)
> > On Mon 18 Jun 07:12 PDT 2018, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > > Qcom 8996 and later chips support prng v2 where we need to only
> > > implement .read callback for hwrng.
> > >
> >
> > The hardware still needs initialization, so I think you should expand
> > this to mention that the initialization is moved to secure world and
> > that's the reason why we only implement read.
> >
> > The question is what happens in projects with other security models.
>
> Can we still read the PRNG_CONFIG register to see if it's already been
> configured or not and then bail out if it isn't configured? That would
> be better as long as we the system doesn't blow up if non-secure mode
> tries to read the config register.
Unfortunately it did blow up for me when I tried it..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists