linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619162741.GC27423@cmpxchg.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:27:41 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer_head to kmemcg

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:13:27PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The buffer_head can consume a significant amount of system memory and
> is directly related to the amount of page cache. In our production
> environment we have observed that a lot of machines are spending a
> significant amount of memory as buffer_head and can not be left as
> system memory overhead.
> 
> Charging buffer_head is not as simple as adding __GFP_ACCOUNT to the
> allocation. The buffer_heads can be allocated in a memcg different from
> the memcg of the page for which buffer_heads are being allocated. One
> concrete example is memory reclaim. The reclaim can trigger I/O of pages
> of any memcg on the system. So, the right way to charge buffer_head is
> to extract the memcg from the page for which buffer_heads are being
> allocated and then use targeted memcg charging API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c                | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  7 +++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 8194e3049fc5..26389b7a3cab 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -815,10 +815,17 @@ struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
>  	struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
>  	gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS;
>  	long offset;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_page(page);
>  
>  	if (retry)
>  		gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
>  
> +	if (memcg) {
> +		gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> +		old_memcg = memalloc_memcg_save(memcg);
> +	}

Please move the get_mem_cgroup_from_page() call out of the
declarations and down to right before the if (memcg) branch.

>  	head = NULL;
>  	offset = PAGE_SIZE;
>  	while ((offset -= size) >= 0) {
> @@ -835,6 +842,11 @@ struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
>  		/* Link the buffer to its page */
>  		set_bh_page(bh, page, offset);
>  	}
> +out:
> +	if (memcg) {
> +		memalloc_memcg_restore(old_memcg);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +		css_put(&memcg->css);
> +#endif

Please add a put_mem_cgroup() ;)

Otherwise this looks fine to me.