linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGM2reboodsYSbu6PPDNoFS7zWH0W1w84TCgouu0EL4sOyGbMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:49:39 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     mhocko@...nel.org, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        osalvador@...hadventures.net, osalvador@...e.de,
        Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        willy@...radead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        mingo@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved

> So I expect this patch needs a cc:stable, which I'll add.
Yes.
> The optimiation patch seems less important and I'd like to hold that
> off for 4.19-rc1?
I agree, the optimization is not as important, and can wait for 4.19.