[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806191853510.10546@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:57:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com, gavin.hindman@...el.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/38] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache
Pseudo-Locking enabling
On Tue, 29 May 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>
> The last patch of this series depends on the series:
> "[RFC PATCH 0/3] Interface for higher order contiguous allocations"
> submitted at:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180212222056.9735-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
> A new version of this was submitted recently and currently being discussed
> at:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180417020915.11786-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
> Without this upstream MM work (and patch 39/39 of this series) it would
There are only 38 patches and none which might depend on Mikes work :)
So the whole thing is self contained and just limited to 4MB, right?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists