[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806191928040.10546@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 19:32:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
cc: steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
peterz@...radead.org, prarit@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
pmladek@...e.com, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] x86/tsc: remove tsc_disabled flag
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> tsc_disabled is set when notsc is passed as kernel parameter. The reason we
> have notsc is to avoid timing problems on multi-socket systems. We already
> have a mechanism, however, to detect and resolve these issues by invoking
> tsc unstable path. Thus, make notsc to behave the same as tsc=unstable.
notsc also excludes TSC from being used at all, while with your change its
suddenly used in sched_clock().
I'm not opposed to that change but the changelog is completely misleading
as it suggest that this is a change which has no functional impact.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists