linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619145605.1eb8e86f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:56:05 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got conflicts in:

  fs/proc/inode.c
  fs/proc/root.c

between commits:

  0223e0999be2 ("procfs: Move proc_fill_super() to fs/proc/root.c")
  83cd45075c36 ("proc: Add fs_context support to procfs")

from the vfs tree and commit:

  cc8cda3af2ba ("proc: Simplify and fix proc by removing the kernel mount")

from the userns tree.

I don't know how to fix this up, so I just dropped the userns tree for
today (since it only contained that one commit).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped