lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620193407.gk5e5ecolo5bel3c@kozik-lap>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:34:07 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Remove unneeded DSI and DECON
 address/size cells in Exynos5433

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:59:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19 June 2018 at 09:26, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 2018-06-18 19:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> The decon, decon_tv and dsi nodes have only one child port so
> >> address/size mappings are not necessary.  This fixes DTC warnings like:
> >>
> >>      Warning (graph_child_address): /soc/decon@...00000/ports:
> >>          graph node has single child node 'port@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > Works fine with current Exynos DRM Decon/MIC/DSI drivers.
> >
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> 
> Thanks for review and testing!

I have second thoughs whether this patch is correct. AFAIU, the drivers
get the remote endpoints by reg==0 (for example the
of_graph_get_remote_node() in exynos_dsi_parse_dt()). If the port shall
be ignored, then reg==-1 should be passed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ