[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwnXSmB_Xn+-wC1fhnAVSa5KQABah-d2_zt3iNL0Cpwvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:51:23 +0900
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: add missing '\0' back to /proc/$pid/cmdline
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 2:08 PM Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -254,10 +258,19 @@ static ssize_t get_mm_cmdline(struct mm_struct *mm, char __user *buf,
> > while (count) {
> > int got;
> > size_t size = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE, count);
>
> We limit size to be at most PAGE_SIZE here.
>
> > + long offset;
> >
> > - got = access_remote_vm(mm, pos, page, size, FOLL_ANON);
> > - if (got <= 0)
> > + /*
> > + * Are we already starting past the official end?
> > + * We always include the last byte that is *supposed*
> > + * to be NUL
> > + */
> > + offset = (pos >= arg_end) ? pos - arg_end + 1 : 0;
> > +
> > + got = access_remote_vm(mm, pos - offset, page, size + offset, FOLL_ANON);
>
> But here we read (size + offset) bytes which may be more than PAGE_SIZE.
Actually, no. We limit size not just to PAGE_SIZE, but to count as well.
And there's *another* limit on 'count' that you missed, namely this part:
/* .. and limit it to a maximum of one page of slop */
if (env_end >= arg_end + PAGE_SIZE)
env_end = arg_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
coupled with
/* .. and we never go past env_end */
if (env_end - pos < count)
count = env_end - pos;
so we know that "pos + size" can never be larger than "arg_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1"
And then:
offset = (pos >= arg_end) ? pos - arg_end + 1 : 0;
means that "offset" will be bigger than zero only if "pos > arg_end-1".
So let's ignore all other cases, and just say that we care about that
case where 'offset' can be non-zero.
So we have
offset = pos - arg_end +1
(from the above initialization of offset), but we also know that
pos + count <= end_end
and since we've limited end_end to "arg_end + PAGE_SIZE -1" we have
pos + count <= arg_end + PAGE_SIZE -1
agreed?
Now, we can do some math on the above. Re-write that "offset = .." equation as
pos = arg_end + offset - 1
And the same time we can take that "pos + count" inequality, and
replacing "pos", we get
arg_end + offset - 1 + count <= arg_end + PAGE_SIZE -1
and then we can remove "arg_end - 1" from both sides, and get
offset+count <= PAGE_SIZE
agreed?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists