[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620082830.vwpcikmpnjluqud4@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:28:30 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reiserfs: use 64-bit values in print_time
On Tue 19-06-18 17:43:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Inode timestamps are now 64-bit wide even on 32-bit machines, and reiserfs
> interprets the 32-bit on-disk timestamps as unsigned when returning them
> to user space with statx(), so for consistency we should print them
> the same way in the emergency console logs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
...
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> index e3c558d1b78c..d0ab3a763962 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ static int sd_is_left_mergeable(struct reiserfs_key *key, unsigned long bsize)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static char *print_time(time_t t)
> +static char *print_time(time64_t t)
> {
> static char timebuf[256];
>
> - sprintf(timebuf, "%ld", t);
> + sprintf(timebuf, "%lld", t);
> return timebuf;
> }
Well, seeing how print_time() is used, more appropriate prototype would be:
static char *print_time(u32 t)
and then print it as %u.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists