lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620072138.yrz76kmms3oviv7i@linux-d8ym>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:21:38 +0200
From:   Michael Moese <mmoese@...e.de>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     ltp@...ts.linux.it, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rafael Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>,
        Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>, ebiggers@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: LTP CVE cve-2017-17053 test failed on x86_64 device

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:14:22PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Test FAIL case output,
> tst_test.c:1015: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
> tst_taint.c:88: BROK: Kernel is already tainted: 512
The kernel is already tainted. In this case, the test refuses to run,
because it could not tell if the test is pass or fail.

Could you please check if you could run the test directly after a
reboot?

Regards,
Michael
-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ