linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: implement smp_cond_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:17:16 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     陈华才 <chenhc@...ote.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com>,
        linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>,
        wuzhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        AndreaParri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: implement smp_cond_load_acquire() for Loongson-3

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:31:55AM +0800, 陈华才 wrote:
> Loongson-3's Store Fill Buffer is nearly the same as your "Store Buffer",
> and it increases the memory ordering weakness. So, smp_cond_load_acquire()
> only need a __smp_mb() before the loop, not after every READ_ONCE(). In
> other word, the following code is just OK:
> 
> #define smp_cond_load_acquire(ptr, cond_expr)                   \
> ({                                                              \
>         typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr);                              \
>         typeof(*ptr) VAL;                                       \
>         __smp_mb();                                     \
>         for (;;) {                                              \
>                 VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);                        \
>                 if (cond_expr)                                  \
>                         break;                                  \
>                 cpu_relax();                                    \
>         }                                                       \
>         __smp_mb();                                     \
>         VAL;                                                    \
> })
> 
> the __smp_mb() before loop is used to avoid "reads prioritised over
> writes", which is caused by SFB's weak ordering and similar to ARM11MPCore
> (mentioned by Will Deacon).

Sure, but smp_cond_load_acquire() isn't the only place you'll see this sort
of pattern in the kernel. In other places, the only existing arch hook is
cpu_relax(), so unless you want to audit all loops and add a special
MIPs-specific smp_mb() to those that are affected, I think your only option
is to stick it in cpu_relax().

I assume you don't have a control register that can disable this
prioritisation in the SFB?

Will