lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9186fc15-c884-a67b-e2fb-113721613146@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:32:38 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
        cwchoi00@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Fix devfreq_add_device() when drivers are
 built as modules.

Hi Chanwoo,

On 20/06/18 02:47, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Enric,
> 
> On 2018년 06월 19일 17:22, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> On 18/06/18 11:02, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>> Missatge de Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com> del dia dg., 17 de juny
>>> 2018 a les 5:50:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Enric,
>>>>
>>>> This issue will happen on the position to use find_devfreq_governor()
>>>> as following:
>>>> - devfreq_add_governora() and governor_store()
>>>>
>>>> If device driver with module type after loaded want to change the
>>>> scaling governor,
>>>> new governor might be not yet loaded. So, devfreq bettero to consider this case
>>>> in the find_devfreq_governor().
>>>>
>>> Ok, I'll move there and send a v2.
>>>
>>
>> I tried your suggestion but I found one problem, if I move the code in
>> find_devfreq_governor it end up with a deadlock. The reason is the following calls.
>>
>> devfreq_add_device
>>   find_devfreq_governor (!!!)
>>     request_module
>>        devfreq_simple_ondemand_init
>>           devfreq_add_governor
>>              find_devfreq_governor (DEADLOCK)
>>
>> So I am wondering if shouldn't be more easy fix the issue in both places,
>> devfreq_add_device and governor_store.
>>
>> To devfreq_add_device
>>
>> devfreq_add_device
>>   governor = find_devfreq_governor
>>   if (IS_ERR(governor) {
> 
> In this error case, you have to unlock the mutex
> before calling the request_module(). I added the pseudo code
> of my opinion.
> 
>>      request_module
>>      governor = find_devfreq_governor
>>      if (IS_ERR(governor)
>>        return ERR_PTR(governor)
>>   }
>>
>> And the same for governor_store
>>
>> governor_store
>>   governor = find_devfreq_governor
>>   if (IS_ERR(governor) {
>>      request_module
>>      governor = find_devfreq_governor
>>      if (IS_ERR(governor)
>>        return ERR_PTR(governor)
>>   }
>>
>> Maybe all  can go in a new function try_find_devfreq_governor_then_request
> 
> How about modify the find_devfreq_governor() as following?
> I think that it is possible because previous find_devfreq_governor()
> always check whether mutex is locked or not.
> 
> 	find_devfreq_governor() {
> 
> 		// check whether mutex is locked or not		
> 		if (!mutex_is_lock(&devfreq_list_lock)) {
> 			WARN(...)
> 			return -EINVAL
> 		}
> 
> 		// find the registered governor with list_for_each_entry
> 
> 		if (governor is not loaded) {
> 			mutex_unlock()
> 			request_module()

Then the problem is that the find_devfreq_governor is reentrant because the init
function of the governor calls devfreq_add_governor and find_devfreq_governor
again. E.g for simpleondemand governor you will get this loop.

find_devfreq_governor
  -> request_module
      -> devfreq_simple_ondemand_init
         -> devfreq_add_governor
            -> find_devfreq_governor
               -> request_module
                  -> devfreq_simple_ondemand_init
                     -> devfreq_add_governor
                        -> find_devfreq_governor
                           -> request_module
                              ...

Makes sense or I am missing something and there is a way to quit from this loop?

FWIW I checked how the cpufreq driver does this as it should have the same
problem. The find_governor function is just a simple search and instead of
integrating the request_module inside the find_governor function they have a
cpu_parse_governor that calls request module from the userspace call and from
the init call.

store_scaling_governor
  -> cpu_parse_governor
     -> request_module

cpufreq_add_dev_interface
  -> cpu_freq_init_policy
     -> cpu_parse_governor
        -> request_module

Thanks,
- Enric

> 			mutex_lock()	
> 		}
> 
> 	}
> 
> 
>>
>> Other suggestions?
>>
>> - Enric
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>  Enric.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2018-06-15 19:04 GMT+09:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra
>>>> <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>:
>>>>> When the devfreq driver and the governor driver are built as modules,
>>>>> the call to devfreq_add_device() fails because the governor driver is
>>>>> not loaded at the time the devfreq driver loads. The devfreq driver has
>>>>> a build dependency on the governor but also should have a runtime
>>>>> dependency. We need to make sure that the governor driver is loaded
>>>>> before the devfreq driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes this bug in devfreq_add_device(). First tries to find
>>>>> the governor, and then, if was not found, it requests the module and
>>>>> tries again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 1b5c1be2c88e (PM / devfreq: map devfreq drivers to governor using name)
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>>> index fe2af6aa88fc..1d917f043e30 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>>>>   */
>>>>>
>>>>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/kmod.h>
>>>>>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>>>>>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>>>>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>>>> @@ -648,10 +649,35 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>>>>
>>>>>         governor = find_devfreq_governor(devfreq->governor_name);
>>>>>         if (IS_ERR(governor)) {
>>>>> -               dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to find governor for the device\n",
>>>>> -                       __func__);
>>>>> -               err = PTR_ERR(governor);
>>>>> -               goto err_init;
>>>>> +               list_del(&devfreq->node);
>>>>> +               mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +               /*
>>>>> +                * If the governor is not found, then request the module and
>>>>> +                * try again. This can happen when both drivers (the governor
>>>>> +                * driver and the driver that calls devfreq_add_device) are
>>>>> +                * built as modules.
>>>>> +                */
>>>>> +               if (!strncmp(devfreq->governor_name,
>>>>> +                            DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, DEVFREQ_NAME_LEN))
>>>>> +                       err = request_module("governor_%s", "simpleondemand");
>>>>> +               else
>>>>> +                       err = request_module("governor_%s",
>>>>> +                                            devfreq->governor_name);
>>>>> +               if (err)
>>>>> +                       goto err_unregister;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +               mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>>> +               list_add(&devfreq->node, &devfreq_list);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +               governor = find_devfreq_governor(devfreq->governor_name);
>>>>> +               if (IS_ERR(governor)) {
>>>>> +                       dev_err(dev,
>>>>> +                               "%s: Unable to find governor for the device\n",
>>>>> +                               __func__);
>>>>> +                       err = PTR_ERR(governor);
>>>>> +                       goto err_init;
>>>>> +               }
>>>>>         }
>>>>>
>>>>>         devfreq->governor = governor;
>>>>> @@ -669,7 +695,7 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>>>>  err_init:
>>>>>         list_del(&devfreq->node);
>>>>>         mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>>> -
>>>>> +err_unregister:
>>>>>         device_unregister(&devfreq->dev);
>>>>>  err_dev:
>>>>>         if (devfreq)
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Chanwoo Choi
>>>> Samsung Electronics
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ