[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4691b85-2346-36ac-3270-ff722032ea1a@ni.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:24:43 -0500
From: Haris Okanovic <haris.okanovic@...com>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daniel@...stot.me>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Don't wake ktimersoftd on every tick
Hi Daniel,
I didn't have time to look at it yet, aside from confirming Mike's issue
reproduces on my machine. It's still on my backlog to investigate.
-- Haris
On 06/19/2018 07:43 AM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2018 05:00 PM, Haris Okanovic wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I haven't tested the patch with wireshark until now. My system also
>> hangs shortly after it starts. I'm pretty sure I hit workqueues in my
>> earlier tests via the block driver, but it's clearly not whatever
>> wireshark is using. I'll look at it and try to post a fix. CCing the
>> list to avoid this patch until then.
>
> Hi Haris,
>
> Do we have any update regarding a newer version of this patch?
>
> -- Daniel
>
>> Thanks,
>> Haris
>>
>>
>> On 04/09/2018 11:02 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are these patches dead, or are you planning another submission? I ask
>>> because I discovered that with them applied, firing up wireshark hangs
>>> the box 100% repeatably, with wireshark never fully initializing.
>>>
>>> Applying them to an otherwise virgin 4.14.20-rt17 to be sure...
>>>
>>> crash> bt 6016PID: 6016 TASK: ffff95dd68572180 CPU: 2 COMMAND:
>>> "dumpcap"
>>> #0 [ffffb490094f3bc0] __schedule at ffffffffa56d55b9
>>> #1 [ffffb490094f3c40] schedule at ffffffffa56d5a03
>>> #2 [ffffb490094f3c58] schedule_timeout at ffffffffa56d8467
>>> #3 [ffffb490094f3cd8] wait_for_completion at ffffffffa56d6e34
>>> #4 [ffffb490094f3d18] __wait_rcu_gp at ffffffffa50e59cd
>>> #5 [ffffb490094f3d58] synchronize_rcu at ffffffffa50ec14e
>>> #6 [ffffb490094f3d98] packet_set_ring at ffffffffc0c74da0 [af_packet]
>>> #7 [ffffb490094f3e50] packet_setsockopt at ffffffffc0c75d23 [af_packet]
>>> #8 [ffffb490094f3ef8] sys_setsockopt at ffffffffa558a5e2
>>> #9 [ffffb490094f3f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa5001b05
>>> #10 [ffffb490094f3f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa5800065
>>> RIP: 00007f3107a1cfaa RSP: 00007ffc9745c2e8 RFLAGS: 00000246
>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f3107a1cfaa
>>> RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000107 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>> RBP: 000055ae1d8eb470 R8: 000000000000001c R9: 0000000000000002
>>> R10: 00007ffc9745c350 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc9745c350
>>> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055ae1d8eb200 R15: 000055ae1d8eb2d0
>>> ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
>>> crash> dmesg
>>> ...
>>> [ 483.808197] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=2 node=0 flags=0x0
>>> nice=0 stuck for 52s!
>>> [ 483.808204] Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
>>> [ 483.808206] workqueue events: flags=0x0
>>> [ 483.808208] pwq 4: cpus=2 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256
>>> [ 483.808211] pending: check_corruption
>>> [ 492.695124] sysrq: SysRq : Trigger a crash
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-rt-users" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIDbA&c=I_0YwoKy7z5LMTVdyO6YCiE2uzI1jjZZuIPelcSjixA&r=8Bziuw3IaCGjyrSAphuGwHmVdHcVwza-srUYwL9U_Ms&m=FlO5SC4s2pRHcS-IG9Y02aEEXYqou1_HtmZakuldqlY&s=JJ8LrCcEF4YKcLbUey5JTreyXV0p1sJ1wqic9LQ1PCE&e=
Powered by blists - more mailing lists