[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620144257.GB27776@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:42:58 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
dave.martin@....com, mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com,
marc.zyngier@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
"Chenxin (Charles)" <charles.chenxin@...wei.com>,
"Xiongfanggou (James)" <james.xiong@...wei.com>,
"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
Zhangyi ac <zhangyi.ac@...wei.com>,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
"kongxinwei (A)" <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
"Liyuan (Larry, Turing Solution)" <Larry.T@...wei.com>,
libeijian@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: KVM guest sometimes failed to boot because of kernel stack
overflow if KPTI is enabled on a hisilicon ARM64 platform.
Hi Wei,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:18:00PM +0800, Wei Xu wrote:
> We have observed KVM guest sometimes failed to boot because of kernel stack
> overflow if KPTI is enabled on a hisilicon arm64 platform.
>
> We also tested with different kernel version and found it is only
> happened if the KPTI and KVM(enable-kvm & cpu=host) are enabled on the
> guest.
> The detail result is as below table.
>
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
> | host |host KPTI | guest | guest KPTI | kvm guest |
> | kernel |enabled | kernel | enabled | booting result |
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
> | 4.17 | Y | 4.17 | Y | stack overflow |
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
> | 4.17 | Y | 4.16 | NA | OK |
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
> | 4.16 | NA | 4.17 | Y | stack overflow |
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
> | 4.16 | NA | 4.16 | NA | OK |
> +---------+----------+--------+------------+-------------------+
>
> A simple walk-around is adding this platform into the "kpti_safe_list".
> But it does not resolve the issue indeed.
> Could you please share any hint how to resolve this kind issue?
> Thanks!
>
> Another issue we found is "kpti_install_ng_mappings" will be invoked
> even "kpti=off" has been added in the kernel command line. Is that expected?
> This is because "kpti" is not a *early* param that "init_cpu_features" will
> be invoked before parsing the param.
That sounds like a straightforward bug, which means we should use
early_param instead of __setup. I assume that doesn't fix your crash,
though?
> The command we are using to run the guest is as:
>
> ./qemu-system-aarch64 -machine virt,kernel_irqchip=on,gic-version=3 -cpu
> host
> -enable-kvm -smp 1 -m 1024 -kernel ./Image -initrd
> ../mini-rootfs-arm64.cpio.gz
> -nographic -append "rdinit=init console=ttyAMA0
> earlycon=pl011,0x9000000"
>
> The log is as below:
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000
> [0x480fd010]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.17.0-45864-g29dcea8-dirty
> (joyx@...ing-Arch-b) (gcc version 4.9.1 20140505 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG
> linaro-1.13.1-4.9-2014.05 - Linaro GCC 4.9-2014.05)) #6 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jun
> 15 21:39:52 CST 2018
^^^ This is reproducible with vanilla v4.17 and defconfig, right?
> [ 0.038859] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
> [ 0.039338] CPU features: detected: GIC system register CPU
> interface
> [ 0.039988] CPU features: detected: Privileged Access Never
> [ 0.040560] CPU features: detected: User Access Override
> [ 0.041093] CPU features: detected: RAS Extension Support
> [ 0.042947] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!
> [ 0.042949] ESR: 0x96000046 -- DABT (current EL)
> [ 0.043963] FAR: 0xffff0000093a80e0
> [ 0.045794] Task stack: [0xffff0000093a8000..0xffff0000093ac000]
> [ 0.052181] IRQ stack: [0xffff000008000000..0xffff000008004000]
> [ 0.058572] Overflow stack:
> [0xffff80003efce2f0..0xffff80003efcf2f0]
> [ 0.065068] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted
> 4.17.0-45864-g29dcea8-dirty #6
> [ 0.073138] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 0.077831] pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO)
> [ 0.082661] pc : el1_sync+0x0/0xb0
> [ 0.086152] lr : kpti_install_ng_mappings+0x120/0x214
Can you use scripts/faddr2line to find out which line of code the lr is
pointing at, please? It would be interesting to know if we managed to
install the idmap.
Hmm, I wonder if this is at all related to RAS, since we've just enabled
that and if we take a fault whilst rewriting swapper then we're going to
get stuck. What happens if you set CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN=n in the guest?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists