[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619223447.4369748b@vmware.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:34:47 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
SergeySenozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Use printk_safe context for TTY and UART port
locks
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:01:49 +0900
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> There is no valid reason why an UART driver should do a printk() of
> any sort inside the critical region where the console is locked.
>
> Just remove those printk's, don't add new crazy locking.
Perhaps we should do an audit of the console drivers and remove all
printk, pr_* , WARN*, BUG* from them.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists