linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: Initial support Texas Instrument's AM654 Platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180621054010.GE112168@atomide.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:40:10 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: Initial support Texas Instrument's AM654
 Platform

* Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [180619 19:46]:
> Hi,
> This is an update from RFC posted earlier:
>         https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=152817866312732&w=2
> 
> The following series enables support for newest addition in TI's SoC
> portfolio - AM654 SoC.
> 
> The series is based off v4.18-rc1, also available here:
> https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/tree/upstream/v4.18-rc1/k3-1-am6-base
> 
> Key changes since RFC are indicated in respective patches:
> * dt bindings updates (from review comments)
> * device tree is split up to incorporate ranges and bus segments
> * Cosmetic fixes including renaming the base dts to prevent confusion
> * UART has been split out

Other than the cbass to interrconnect naming, looks good to me now:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>