[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ec10627-49a5-07ad-8c9d-5ac873096cc0@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:22:24 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
reset framework
Hi Bartosz,
On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
> framework.
>
> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
> merged.
Series looks good to me.
To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
and #2 ?
Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
Open to other suggestions as well.
Thanks,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists