[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGM2reYethiqDLM0dRRSihvRCi24b_B=eBR05G=nWVQSL9LVww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:16:32 -0400
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To: feng.tang@...el.com
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com, peterz@...radead.org, prarit@...hat.com,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] x86/tsc: use tsc early
> Do we still need add a static_key? after Peter worked out the patch
> to enable ealy jump_label_init?
Hi Feng,
With Pete's patch we will still need at least one static branch, but
as I replied to Pete's email I like the idea of initializing
jump_label_init() early, but in my opinion it should be a separate
work, with tsc.c cleanup patch.
Thank you,
Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists