[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621130511.GA7895@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:05:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> +Control Flow Enforcement Technology (CET) provides protection against
> +return/jump-oriented programing (ROP) attacks.
So the obvious abbreviation would be CFT or CFET.
Exactly why is 'CET' used, which not only has very little to do with what it's
supposed to mean, but is also a well-known timezone, Central European Time?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists