[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49706f0e-03b6-8c43-c35f-c0b0338a17bd@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:27:23 +0800
From: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 V3] Allocate pages for kdump without encryption when
SME is enabled
在 2018年06月21日 18:23, Baoquan He 写道:
> On 06/21/18 at 01:06pm, lijiang wrote:
>> 在 2018年06月21日 09:53, Baoquan He 写道:
>>> On 06/16/18 at 04:27pm, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
>>>> When SME is enabled in the first kernel, we will allocate pages
>>>> for kdump without encryption in order to be able to boot the
>>>> second kernel in the same manner as kexec, which helps to keep
>>>> the same code style.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/kexec_core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>>>> index 20fef1a..3c22a9b 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>>>> @@ -471,6 +471,16 @@ static struct page *kimage_alloc_crash_control_pages(struct kimage *image,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + if (pages) {
>>>> + unsigned int count, i;
>>>> +
>>>> + pages->mapping = NULL;
>>>> + set_page_private(pages, order);
>>>> + count = 1 << order;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>>>> + SetPageReserved(pages + i);
>>>
>>> I guess you might imitate the kexec case, however kexec get pages from
>>> buddy. Crash pages are reserved in memblock, these codes might make no sense.
>>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>> We have changed the attribute of pages, so the original attribute of pages will be
>> restored when they free.
>
> Hmm, you can check what kimage_free() is doing, and where
> kimage->control_pages, dest_pages, unusable_pages is assigned. Do you
> know where these original attribute of pages comes from and they are
> used/needed in CRASH case, if you care about them?
>
Originally, we want to have an opportunity to restore the previous attribute of pages, that
should be more better if the pages are remembered in 'image->control_pages'.
If we remove these codes, it is also harmless for kdump, but it will become strange, maybe
someone could ask where to restore the previous attribute of pages.
Thanks.
>>
>>>> + arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(page_address(pages), 1 << order, 0);
>>>> + }
>>>> return pages;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -865,6 +875,7 @@ static int kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
>>>> result = -ENOMEM;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>> + arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(page_address(page), 1, 0);
>>>> ptr = kmap(page);
>>>> ptr += maddr & ~PAGE_MASK;
>>>> mchunk = min_t(size_t, mbytes,
>>>> @@ -882,6 +893,7 @@ static int kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
>>>> result = copy_from_user(ptr, buf, uchunk);
>>>> kexec_flush_icache_page(page);
>>>> kunmap(page);
>>>> + arch_kexec_pre_free_pages(page_address(page), 1);
>>>> if (result) {
>>>> result = -EFAULT;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.9.5
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> kexec mailing list
>>>> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Powered by blists - more mailing lists