[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37979107-e550-61b4-1e7a-d331584af9fa@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:10:11 +0530
From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 161/279] kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme()
completion issue
HI Greg,
Yes more patches related to this are coming,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/7/317
So i thought, if all go together then it is good.
Regards
Gaurav
On 6/21/2018 12:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10:31PM +0530, Kohli, Gaurav wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> As more patches related to this are coming in 4.17, so it is better if all
>> go together on different branches, plz suggest.
>
> I do not understand, sorry. What is wrong with this as-is? If I need
> to take other patches as well, please let me know what commits and what
> stable tree(s) they belong on.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists