[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d55c2992-09b8-5182-419d-8efa5782ea16@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 08:58:18 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, mjw@...oraproject.org,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>,
Cary Coutant <ccoutant@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] x86: Add build salt to the vDSO and kernel linker
scripts
On 06/21/2018 05:43 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Both the kernel and the vDSO need to have unique build ids.
>> Insert the build salt section to make the build ids unique.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-layout.lds.S | 3 ++-
>> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>
> What is the upstream merge plan for this series? kbuild tree?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
There was an alternate proposal that requires slightly fewer
changes that needs to be cleaned up and submitted. I do
think the plan is for the series to eventually go through
the kbuild tree.
Thanks,
Laura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists