linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Return the actual size when receiving an unsupported command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180621164819.GE11859@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:48:19 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ricardo Schwarzmeier <Ricardo.Schwarzmeier@...ineon.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, arnd@...db.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Return the actual size when receiving an
 unsupported command

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:55:07AM +0200, Ricardo Schwarzmeier wrote:
> The command size is computed for the header anyway.
> It can as well indicate the correct number of bytes to read from the driver.
> Fixes: 095531f891e6 ("tpm: return a TPM_RC_COMMAND_CODE response if command is not implemented")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Schwarzmeier <Ricardo.Schwarzmeier@...ineon.com>

Can you fix the kbuild error and send v3? Otherwise, LGMT.

/Jarkko