[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621150452.4480c33f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:04:52 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
raistlin@...ux.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@...il.com, bristot@...hat.com, kernel-team@....com,
joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/2] sched/deadline: Set cp->elements[0].cpu
to -1 when the heap is empty
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:58:25 +0900
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com> wrote:
> Hello Steven and Daniel,
>
> I've changed the 2nd patch a little bit to consider cpudl_clear()
> additionally. Can I keep your Acked-by on?
Actually, I think this should be a separate patch. It handles a
different issue.
>
> (I temporarily removed the Acked-by you gave me.)
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
>
> -----8<-----
> >From 1e368d276186c22f9da298206c718b33e805828d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:05:08 +0900
> Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/2] sched/deadline: Set cp->elements[0].cpu to -1 when the
> heap is empty
>
> Currently, migrating tasks to cpu0 unconditionally happens when the
> heap is empty, since cp->elements[0].cpu is initialized to 0(=cpu0).
> We have to distinguish between the empty case and cpu0 to avoid the
> unnecessary migrations. Therefore, it has to return an invalid value
> e.i. -1 in the case the heap is empty.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> index ae4fbdc..a200b36 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,10 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
>
> WARN_ON(best_cpu != -1 && !cpu_present(best_cpu));
>
> + /* The heap tree is empty, just return. */
> + if (best_cpu == -1)
> + return 0;
> +
Actually, why not put the if before the WARN_ON, and then we can
simplify the WARN_ON:
if (best_cpu == -1)
return 0;
WARN_ON(!cpu_present(best_cpu));
-- Steve
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(best_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
> dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cpudl_maximum_dl(cp))) {
> if (later_mask)
> @@ -172,6 +176,13 @@ void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
> * This could happen if a rq_offline_dl is
> * called for a CPU without -dl tasks running.
> */
> + } else if (cp->size == 1){
> + /* Only one element in the heap, clear it. */
> + cp->elements[0].cpu = -1;
> + cp->elements[cpu].idx = IDX_INVALID;
> + cp->size = 0;
> +
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
> } else {
> new_cpu = cp->elements[cp->size - 1].cpu;
> cp->elements[old_idx].dl = cp->elements[cp->size - 1].dl;
> @@ -267,6 +278,9 @@ int cpudl_init(struct cpudl *cp)
> for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> cp->elements[i].idx = IDX_INVALID;
>
> + /* Mark heap as initially empty. */
> + cp->elements[0].cpu = -1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists