lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621150452.4480c33f@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:04:52 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        raistlin@...ux.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        juri.lelli@...il.com, bristot@...hat.com, kernel-team@....com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/2] sched/deadline: Set cp->elements[0].cpu
 to -1 when the heap is empty

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:58:25 +0900
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com> wrote:

> Hello Steven and Daniel,
> 
> I've changed the 2nd patch a little bit to consider cpudl_clear()
> additionally. Can I keep your Acked-by on?

Actually, I think this should be a separate patch. It handles a
different issue.

> 
> (I temporarily removed the Acked-by you gave me.)
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> 
> -----8<-----
> >From 1e368d276186c22f9da298206c718b33e805828d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001  
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:05:08 +0900
> Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/2] sched/deadline: Set cp->elements[0].cpu to -1 when the
>  heap is empty
> 
> Currently, migrating tasks to cpu0 unconditionally happens when the
> heap is empty, since cp->elements[0].cpu is initialized to 0(=cpu0).
> We have to distinguish between the empty case and cpu0 to avoid the
> unnecessary migrations. Therefore, it has to return an invalid value
> e.i. -1 in the case the heap is empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> index ae4fbdc..a200b36 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,10 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
>  
>  		WARN_ON(best_cpu != -1 && !cpu_present(best_cpu));
>  
> +		/* The heap tree is empty, just return. */
> +		if (best_cpu == -1)
> +			return 0;
> +

Actually, why not put the if before the WARN_ON, and then we can
simplify the WARN_ON:

	if (best_cpu == -1)
		return 0;

	WARN_ON(!cpu_present(best_cpu));

-- Steve

>  		if (cpumask_test_cpu(best_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
>  		    dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cpudl_maximum_dl(cp))) {
>  			if (later_mask)
> @@ -172,6 +176,13 @@ void cpudl_clear(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu)
>  		 * This could happen if a rq_offline_dl is
>  		 * called for a CPU without -dl tasks running.
>  		 */
> +	} else if (cp->size == 1){
> +		/* Only one element in the heap, clear it. */
> +		cp->elements[0].cpu = -1;
> +		cp->elements[cpu].idx = IDX_INVALID;
> +		cp->size = 0;
> +
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
>  	} else {
>  		new_cpu = cp->elements[cp->size - 1].cpu;
>  		cp->elements[old_idx].dl = cp->elements[cp->size - 1].dl;
> @@ -267,6 +278,9 @@ int cpudl_init(struct cpudl *cp)
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>  		cp->elements[i].idx = IDX_INVALID;
>  
> +	/* Mark heap as initially empty. */
> +	cp->elements[0].cpu = -1;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ