[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621194656.GB13636@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:46:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/16] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split
lock in kernel mode
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 08:45:51AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> When #AC exception for split lock is triggered from a kernel instruction,
> by default we don't want the exception to panic the whole system. Instead,
> the exception handler should log the fault information for debug and
> continue the instruction execution.
This should not happen today, did you find any unaligned LOCK insns?
This is a lot of code to 'handle' something that really should not ever
happen. Maybe just WARN and clear the MSR bit, nothing complicated.
Also, fix your "disgusting drug-induced crap" comments.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists