[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621220721.GA2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:07:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split
locked accesses
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> And perf cannot count split lock events in firmware. In real time, even
> split lock in firmware (reboot, run time services, etc) may not be tolerant
> and need to be detected and prevented.
And yet you want to allow firmware to use them by excluding it in these
here patches. Make up your mind.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists