[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180622102800.4p6wabmte4yf4rtp@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:28:00 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Michael Straube <michael.straube@...teo.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix brace coding style issues
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> Remove braces from single line if statements.
> Also fix a comparsion to NULL in one of the conditions.
> Issues found by checkpatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <michael.straube@...teo.de>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
> index f852fde47350..2244ed72ab9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
> @@ -618,9 +618,8 @@ ssize_t proc_set_wait_hiq_empty(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, si
> if (count < 1)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp))) {
> + if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
> sscanf(tmp, "%u", &g_wait_hiq_empty);
> - }
The original code is kind of bad. The NULL check isn't required.
The sscanf call should have error checking. The error code is wrong if
the copy from user fails. The tmp buffer isn't NUL terminated.
if (copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
return -EFAULT;
tmp[sizeof(tmp) - 1] = '\0';
if (sscanf(tmp, "%u", &g_wait_hiq_empty) != 1)
return -EINVAL;
return count;
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists