[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180622111839.10071-5-osalvador@techadventures.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:18:39 +0200
From: osalvador@...hadventures.net
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz, pasha.tatashin@...cle.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Callers of register_mem_sect_under_node() are always passing a valid
memory_block (not NULL), so we can safely drop the check for NULL.
In the same way, register_mem_sect_under_node() is only called in case
the node is online, so we can safely remove that check as well.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
---
drivers/base/node.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 845d5523812b..1ac4c36e13bb 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -404,12 +404,7 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg)
int ret, nid = *(int *)arg;
unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
- if (!mem_blk)
- return -EFAULT;
-
mem_blk->nid = nid;
- if (!node_online(nid))
- return 0;
sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr);
sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr);
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists