lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW9FUMQ568GTJG_p9J8jFbVLOR6hPhsxsaMTttQjp=Wzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:09:59 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] time: Make sure jiffies_to_msecs() preserves non-zero
 time periods

Hi Thomas,

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:49 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > For the common cases where 1000 is a multiple of HZ, or HZ is a multiple
> > of 1000, jiffies_to_msecs() never returns zero when passed a non-zero
> > time period.
> >
> > However, if HZ > 1000 and not an integer multiple of 1000 (e.g. 1024 or
> > 1200, as used on alpha and DECstation), jiffies_to_msecs() may return
> > zero for small non-zero time periods.  This may break code that relies
> > on receiving back a non-zero value.
> >
> > jiffies_to_usecs() does not need such a fix, as <linux/jiffies.h> does
> > not support values of HZ larger than 12287, thus rejecting any
> > problematic huge values of HZ.
>
> Sorry, I'm not understanding that sentence at all.

Sorry for being unclear.

1 jiffy can only be less than 1µs if HZ > 1000000.
But include/linux/jiffies.h checks if HZ >= 12288, and does #error otherwise.
In addition, there's a "BUILD_BUG_ON(HZ > USEC_PER_SEC)" in time.c

> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> This lacks a stable tag, right?

Up to the maintainer to add, isn't it?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ